- Call on : +44 (0)20 8559 8295
- Open Hours : Mon-Fri 08:00 - 17:30
Premier Security Ballistic & Blast Ltd
Premier Security Ballistic & Blast Ltd manufactures blast resistant doors, windows, glazing and curtain walling systems certified to ISO 16933, EN 13123 and EN 13541. With over 30 years of experience supplying high-security solutions to government, defence, critical national infrastructure and commercial clients, our products are independently tested to the most demanding blast standards in the world.
Browse our range of independently certified blast resistant building products. Each product category page covers detailed specifications, available ratings and application guidance.
Blast resistance is the measured ability of a building component, such as a door, window, glazing panel or curtain wall system, to withstand the pressure wave generated by an explosion. When a bomb detonates, it produces an extremely rapid and powerful positive-phase overpressure followed by a negative-phase suction. This combination can cause catastrophic structural failure, propel glass fragments at lethal velocity into occupied spaces and structurally compromise an entire building envelope.
A blast resistant product is one that has been independently tested against a defined explosive charge at a specified standoff distance and shown to perform within defined hazard limits. The result is a rated classification, issued by the certifying body, that tells a specifier precisely what threat the product has been verified to resist.
Blast resistance is a separate performance criterion from forced entry resistance and ballistic resistance. A product holding an LPS 1175 forced entry rating is not automatically blast rated, and a product with a ballistic rating to EN 1522 is not automatically certified against blast. Each discipline requires independent testing under its own standard. High-security installations protecting critical infrastructure frequently specify all three to ensure comprehensive protection against the full range of credible threats.
Blast protection is a requirement wherever the credible threat includes an explosive device, whether from terrorism, industrial accident or conflict. The following sectors routinely specify blast resistant building products:
Threat assessments for these buildings are typically conducted by qualified security consultants in collaboration with the NPSA (National Protective Security Authority), formerly CPNI. The outcome of that assessment will define the blast standard and rating classification required, which in turn drives product selection and specification.
Three primary standards govern blast resistance testing and classification for building products in the UK and Europe. Each covers a different scope, uses a different test method and produces a different rating format. Understanding which standard applies to your project is essential before specifying products.
The principal counter-terrorism glazing standard in the UK. Tests glazing systems using real open-air explosive detonations. Produces EXV ratings (vehicle bomb) and SB ratings (satchel bomb), each combined with a hazard rating letter from A to F describing the consequence to building occupants.
The European standard for complete fenestration assemblies including windows, doors, shutters and curtain walling. Tested by shock tube (EPR ratings) or arena (EXR ratings). Widely specified for industrial and petrochemical applications as well as counter-terrorism work where assembly certification is required.
A shock-tube standard for glazing alone, tested as a single pane in a rigid frame. Produces ER ratings (ER1 to ER4). Primarily used for material qualification and product development. For full-system specification on live projects, ISO 16933 or EN 13123 is the appropriate reference.
ISO 16933:2007 (confirmed 2023) is the most widely specified blast glazing standard for counter-terrorism applications in the United Kingdom. It tests glazing systems against open-air detonations using real explosive charges, making it the most realistic of the available blast testing methodologies. The results are presented as a two-part classification combining a severity level (the number) and a hazard rating (the letter), both of which are essential to understanding what a product actually delivers.
EXV ratings address the threat from vehicle-borne improvised explosive devices (VBIEDs), based on a 100kg TNT-equivalent charge detonated at varying standoff distances. The lower the standoff distance, the more severe the blast loading and the harder the test.
| Classification | Standoff Distance | Peak Air-Blast Pressure | Positive Phase Impulse |
|---|---|---|---|
| EXV45 | 45 m | 30 kPa | 180 kPa-ms |
| EXV33 | 33 m | 50 kPa | 250 kPa-ms |
| EXV25 | 25 m | 80 kPa | 380 kPa-ms |
| EXV19 | 19 m | 140 kPa | 600 kPa-ms |
| EXV15 | 15 m | 250 kPa | 850 kPa-ms |
| EXV12 | 12 m | 450 kPa | 1,200 kPa-ms |
| EXV10 | 10 m | 800 kPa | 1,600 kPa-ms |
SB ratings address hand-carried devices placed in close proximity to a building. The charges range from 3kg to 20kg TNT equivalent at standoff distances from 3m to 9m, representing the threat profile of a device placed against or near a building entrance.
| Classification | Peak Pressure | Positive Impulse | Equivalent Scenario |
|---|---|---|---|
| SB1 | 70 kPa | 150 kPa-ms | 3 kg TNT at 9 m |
| SB2 | 110 kPa | 200 kPa-ms | 3 kg TNT at 7 m |
| SB3 | 250 kPa | 300 kPa-ms | 3 kg TNT at 5 m |
| SB4 | 800 kPa | 500 kPa-ms | 3 kg TNT at 3 m |
| SB5 | 700 kPa | 700 kPa-ms | 12 kg TNT at 5.5 m |
| SB6 | 1,600 kPa | 1,000 kPa-ms | 12 kg TNT at 4 m |
| SB7 | 2,800 kPa | 1,500 kPa-ms | 20 kg TNT at 4 m |
A product's ISO 16933 rating is only complete when the hazard letter is included alongside the severity number. A rating of EXV25(C) and EXV25(F) represent radically different outcomes for the people inside the building, even though both were tested at the same blast level. The hazard rating is a direct measure of occupant safety.
| Hazard Rating | Classification | What Happens to the Glazing | Occupant Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | No Break | The glazing does not fracture. No visible damage to the system. | None from glazing failure |
| B | No Hazard | The glazing fractures but the inner leaf is fully retained in the frame. No breach. No material enters the interior. | Negligible |
| C | Minimal Hazard | Inner leaf substantially retained. Tears and pullout less than 50% of the sight perimeter. Minimal floor fragments. Most commonly specified pass criterion for counter-terrorism work. | Very low |
| D | Very Low Hazard | Glazing fractures. Significant parts located no further than 1 m behind the original face position. Same fragment limits as C. | Low within standoff zone |
| E | Low Hazard | Fragments fall between 1 m and 3 m behind the interior face, no more than 0.5 m above the floor. Up to 10 rateable perforations on the witness panel. | Moderate. Generally not acceptable for occupied buildings. |
| F | High Hazard | More than 10 rateable perforations in the witness panel, or a single perforation penetrating more than 12 mm. Significant fragmentation hazard. | High. Not acceptable for occupied buildings. |
For most UK counter-terrorism specifications, the minimum acceptable outcome is a hazard rating of C (Minimal Hazard). Government buildings, embassies and high-security facilities frequently require A or B. Ratings of E and F are considered failures in occupied building contexts and should not appear in a valid specification.
Example: A product specified as EXV25(C) has been arena-tested against 100 kg TNT at 25 m standoff and achieved minimal hazard, meaning the inner glazing face was substantially retained with only minor fragmentation. This is a meaningful, verifiable guarantee of performance, not a marketing claim.
Where ISO 16933 classifies glazing performance, EN 13123 and EN 13124 classify the complete fenestration assembly, including the frame, fixings, infills, hardware and seals. This is the correct standard to reference when the specification requires certification of the entire installed product rather than the glazing material alone.
The standard is divided into two parts depending on test method. Part 1 uses a shock tube to simulate explosion pressure in a controlled laboratory environment. Part 2 uses open-air arena testing with real explosive charges. Both parts use separate rating scales and are not directly comparable.
EPR (Explosion Pressure Resistance) ratings are produced by shock tube testing and are expressed in bar. They are commonly used for industrial and petrochemical blast specifications where the slower-rising pressure profile of a confined deflagration is more relevant than a counter-terrorism detonation scenario.
| Classification | Peak Pressure | Positive Impulse | Duration |
|---|---|---|---|
| EPR1 | 0.5 bar (50 kPa) | 3.7 bar.ms | Minimum 20 ms |
| EPR2 | 1.0 bar (100 kPa) | 9 bar.ms | Minimum 20 ms |
| EPR3 | 1.5 bar (150 kPa) | 15 bar.ms | Minimum 20 ms |
| EPR4 | 2.0 bar (200 kPa) | 22 bar.ms | Minimum 20 ms |
EPR ratings may carry an S (splinters) or NS (no splinters) suffix indicating whether material came off the protected face during the test. NS is the higher classification and is typically required where personnel are present behind the assembly.
EXR ratings are produced by open-air arena testing using real explosive charges at defined standoff distances. They address the more intense, rapidly-rising pressure profile of a detonation event and are applicable to counter-terrorism scenarios where a whole-assembly rating is required alongside or instead of a glazing-only ISO 16933 rating.
| Classification | Charge | Standoff | Peak Pressure |
|---|---|---|---|
| EXR1 | 3 kg TNT | 5 m | 2.5 bar |
| EXR2 | 3 kg TNT | 3 m | 8 bar |
| EXR3 | 12 kg TNT | 5.5 m | 7 bar |
| EXR4 | 12 kg TNT | 4 m | 16 bar |
| EXR5 | 20 kg TNT | 4 m | 28 bar |
EN 13541:2012 is a shock-tube standard for testing a single pane of glass in a rigid frame. It produces ER1 to ER4 ratings, each with an S or NS suffix, and is primarily used for glazing material qualification and product development rather than for specifying whole-system performance on a live project.
Because EN 13541 tests only a glass pane in an idealised rigid frame, it does not capture the real-world interaction between glazing, frame, fixings and substrate that determines how a product actually performs in an installation. For project specifications requiring reliable blast performance assurance, ISO 16933 or EN 13123/13124 provides the more appropriate reference, as both can certify the complete installed assembly.
| Classification | Peak Overpressure | Positive Specific Impulse |
|---|---|---|
| ER1 | 50 to <100 kPa | 370 to <900 kPa-ms |
| ER2 | 100 to <150 kPa | 900 to <1,500 kPa-ms |
| ER3 | 150 to <200 kPa | 1,500 to <2,200 kPa-ms |
| ER4 | 200 to <250 kPa | 2,200 to <3,200 kPa-ms |
Understanding which standard to specify is as important as understanding what the rating means. The three standards address different threat scenarios and different scopes of testing. The table below provides a direct comparison to assist specifiers in selecting the correct reference for their project.
| Standard | What Is Tested | Test Method | Rating Format | Best Suited To |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ISO 16933 | Glazing (and framed assembly where applicable) | Open-air arena, real explosives | EXV[n](letter) / SB[n](letter) | Counter-terrorism, government, embassy, CNI |
| EN 13123-1 / EN 13124-1 | Complete assembly (window, door, curtain wall) | Shock tube simulation | EPR1 to EPR4 (S or NS) | Industrial, petrochemical, refinery, gas processing |
| EN 13123-2 / EN 13124-2 | Complete assembly (window, door, curtain wall) | Open-air arena, real explosives | EXR1 to EXR5 (S or NS) | Counter-terrorism whole-system certification |
| EN 13541 | Glass pane only, rigid frame | Shock tube simulation | ER1 to ER4 (S or NS) | Material qualification, product development |
For most UK counter-terrorism specifications driven by an NPSA-aligned threat assessment, ISO 16933 is the appropriate standard for glazing performance and EN 13123-2 / EN 13124-2 is the appropriate standard where whole-assembly certification is required. For industrial applications such as oil and gas or petrochemical processing, EN 13123-1 / EN 13124-1 (EPR ratings) is the standard most commonly referenced in design briefs.
Blast resistance cannot be assessed by calculation alone. A building product must be physically subjected to explosive loading and its performance observed and classified by an independent accredited testing facility. Only then can a manufacturer legitimately state that a product holds a defined blast rating.
At Premier Security Ballistic & Blast Ltd, all blast ratings are obtained through independent third-party testing at recognised facilities. We do not self-certify. Every rated product is supported by a formal test report from the testing body, which can be provided to specifiers, project managers and security consultants as part of the product submission package.
Many of the facilities that require blast resistance also require protection against ballistic attack and forced entry. Critical national infrastructure sites, government buildings, embassies and military installations regularly specify products that have been independently certified across all three disciplines.
Premier Security Ballistic & Blast Ltd manufactures products that can hold simultaneous certification to:
Each certification is obtained separately through independent testing. Combined ratings confirm that a single product has been verified against all specified threats without any certification implying another. This allows specifiers to identify a single product that satisfies multiple lines of a security schedule rather than relying on a composite assembly of separately sourced and unvalidated components.
For further information on our ballistic ratings, see our Ballistic Resistance guide. For forced entry ratings, see our LPS 1175 guide.
For vehicle bomb scenarios, EXV25(C) and EXV19(C) to ISO 16933 are among the most widely specified ratings for urban government and commercial counter-terrorism applications. The exact rating required will be determined by the site-specific threat assessment, standoff distances available and the consequence level associated with the building. NPSA guidance documents provide the framework for that assessment.
ISO 16933 classifies glazing performance against open-air explosive detonations and uses the EXV and SB rating format with hazard letters. EN 13123 and EN 13124 classify the complete fenestration assembly, including frames and fixings, and use EPR (shock tube) or EXR (arena) ratings without hazard letters. The two standards are not interchangeable, and a product rating under one does not imply a rating under the other.
No. Depending on the standard, a blast rating can apply to glazing only (ISO 16933, EN 13541) or to the complete assembly including frames, fixings, hardware and seals (EN 13123 / EN 13124). At Premier Security, we manufacture complete door and window systems where the blast rating applies to the full certified assembly, not just the glass.
It is technically possible to specify a product with a defined blast rating without a formal threat assessment, but it is not recommended. A threat assessment determines the credible explosive device, the minimum achievable standoff, and therefore the required blast classification. Without this information, a specifier cannot confirm that the chosen rating is appropriate for the actual risk. Premier's technical team works alongside security consultants and specifiers to ensure the product specification aligns with the assessed threat.
Blast resistance is not a mandatory Building Regulations requirement in the UK. It is typically driven by a security risk assessment, client requirement, planning condition or insurer requirement. Products must still comply with all applicable Building Regulations covering structural performance, energy efficiency, access and fire safety, which Premier Security's products are designed to address alongside their blast certifications.
Yes. Our blast resistant window and door systems are specified for petrochemical, oil refinery, gas processing and other industrial environments where EPR-rated products are required to protect control rooms and occupied buildings from deflagration events. We can advise on the appropriate EPR rating for your facility based on your process hazard assessment.
Premier Security Ballistic & Blast Ltd has over 30 years of experience designing and manufacturing independently certified blast resistant doors, windows, glazing and curtain walling systems for the UK's most demanding security environments. Our technical team works directly with architects, security consultants, main contractors and government bodies to ensure the right product is specified for every project.
Contact us to discuss your project requirements, request a product submission package or arrange a technical consultation.
Get in Touch with Our Team